•  0800 662 837
  •  [email protected]
  • About Us
    • Our Mandate
    • Our Profile
    • Our Leadership
    • Our Business Units
  • Complaints
    • How to lodge a complaint
    • Process to lodge a complaint
    • Know Your Rights
    • FAQs
  • Systemic issues
  • Publications
    • Annual Reports & Strategic Plans
    • Newsletters
      • Fairness for All
      • Fair Play
    • Brochures & Guides
    • Media Releases
  • Media
    • OTO in the News
  • Careers
  • About Us
    • Our Mandate
    • Our Profile
    • Our Leadership
    • Our Business Units
  • Complaints
    • How to lodge a complaint
    • Process to lodge a complaint
    • Know Your Rights
    • FAQs
  • Systemic issues
  • Publications
    • Annual Reports & Strategic Plans
    • Newsletters
      • Fairness for All
      • Fair Play
    • Brochures & Guides
    • Media Releases
  • Media
    • OTO in the News
  • Careers

Fairness for All: Case 9

The case below describes how SARS delayed payment of a refund to a taxpayer, even after it had allowed an objection to the assessment raised, by repeatedly paying the refund and then recalling it immediately from the taxpayer’s bank account.

Read now
Related Articles
Fairness for all: Case 23
Fair Play 28
Fairness for all: Case 22
Recent Posts
  • Fairness for all: Case 23 16 May 2023
  • Fair Play 28 3 Mar 2023
  • Fairness for all: Case 22 8 Feb 2023
  • Have your say! 31 Jan 2023
  • OTO Online Complaints System Challenges 23 Jan 2023
Categories
Useful Links
  • SARS
  • National Treasury
  • Public Protector
  • Tax Legislation
Site Links
  • Contact Us
  • Your Tax Rights
  • Lodge a Complaint
  • Privacy Policy
Complaints
  • Lodge a complaint
  • Complaints Guide
  • How to lodge a complaint